The 
              2004 Elections: War, Terrorism and the Need for Regime Change 
               By 
              Carl Davidson  
            How do we unite 
              a majority of Americans around a plan to get out of Iraq? Noam Chomsky, 
              writing in the May 6 issue of the Nation, summed up the “US 
              Out, UN In!” perspective as clearly as anyone:  
            “A large 
              majority of Americans believe that the UN, not the United States, 
              should take the lead in working with Iraqis to transfer authentic 
              sovereignty as well as in economic reconstruction and maintaining 
              civic order. That is a sensible stand if Iraqis agree, as seems 
              likely, though the General Assembly, less directly controlled by 
              the invaders, is preferable to the Security Council as the responsible 
              transitional authority. Reconstruction should be in the hands of 
              Iraqis, not delayed as a means of controlling them, as Washington 
              has indicated. Reparations--not just aid--should be provided by 
              those responsible for devastating Iraqi civilian society by cruel 
              sanctions and military actions; and--together with other criminal 
              states--for supporting Saddam Hussein through his worst atrocities 
              and beyond. That is the minimum that honesty requires.” 
            Next we have 
              to take a deeper look at the issue of terrorism. Terror has been 
              a tactic deployed by both progressive and reactionary movements 
              in various times, place and circumstances. There is both state-sponsored 
              terror and the terror of non-state, insurgent movements. There is 
              the terrorist violence described by Franz Fanon in the Algerian 
              war of liberation. On the other hand, there is the terrorism in 
              the classic definition of fascism, put forth by Georgi Dimitrov 
              in the 1930s, where he describes Germany and Italy as “the 
              open terrorist dictatorship of the most reactionary, chauvinist 
              sections of finance capital.” 
            As for state-sponsored 
              terrorism, if we are honest, we have to say that the U.S government, 
              at least over the past 50 years, has been the chief terrorist and 
              sponsor of terrorism in the world. We can never forget that our 
              government has the blood of a million Vietnamese on its hands. Most 
              Americans do not even know that ours is the only country actually 
              convicted of terrorism in a world court, for the atrocities of the 
              U.S. sponsored Contras in Nicaragua. 
            War 
              Combined with Racism 
            Bush and Rumsfeld 
              have gone to great lengths to claim that the abuse and torture prisoners 
              in Iraq are not part of the America character. Really? Not all of 
              America, to be sure, but organized terror, especially again those 
              with darker skin, is a deep strain in our history. As Tim Wise pointed 
              out May 13 on ZNet:  
            “The images 
              from Fallujah were not unique to Iraqis, and those from Abu Ghraib 
              [prison] are not exceptional in the least. It wasn't that long ago, 
              after all, that literally thousands of white Christians in this 
              country would regularly engage in weekend lynch parties, or at least 
              observe as spectators, giving the events all the spectacle of a 
              three-ring circus. The lynch mobs would, with full approval of the 
              demented white Christian crowds that gathered to cheer them on, 
              drag blacks to death behind cars, torture them with blowtorches 
              and burn them to death in what were advertised as "Negro Barbecues." 
              More >> 
              
             |