Globalisation
and Class Struggle in Germany (page
1 of 5)
By Jerry
Harris
Throughout
the world globalisation is creating the conditions for class struggle.
Nation centric pattern of accumulation are being overturned by a
transnational system of production. This process affects each country
in a different manner, geared to each nation’s existing political
and social structure. This dialectic, between descending forms of
national accumulation and the ascending power of globalism, is the
dominant contradiction in the world. It is a contested process played
out on the political stage and in the economic struggles between
capital and labor and between competing groups of capitalists.
These
conflicts are present at every level of German society. The German
working class enjoys one of the highest living standards and level
of social entitlements in the world. These developed out of a strong
socialist and trade union tradition and the industrial growth that
rebuilt the country after W.W.II. Germany, as a front-line state
facing the Warsaw block, also needed to be a positive example for
capitalism. This pressured German industrial and finance capitalists
to accept many social-democratic demands bringing relative stability
to labor/management relations. In turn, the German industrial base
became a leading world exporter in autos, chemicals, machine tools
and other important products. Even today Germany remains the largest
exporter of manufactured goods in the world and contributes one-third
of the European GDP. National production provided the strong job
base and profits that created the post-war German economic model
with its strong social contract and consensus building method of
co-determination between capital and labor.
Today
the most powerful corporations in Germany are also some of the world’s
most transnationalized. The owners and managers of these corporations
are part of the transnational capitalist class (TCC) and are the
most political influential and economically dominant sector of the
German ruling class. This sector of German capital, along with their
representatives in the major political parties, are retooling German
society to fit the new global mode of accumulation. This entails
transforming labor relations, the role of the state, and the social
structure that had been built to accommodate a nation-centric economy.
These changes have naturally created rifts within German society
with those social forces, both in labor and nationally based capital,
which are invested in the old system. This challenge, with its alternative
forms of organization and labor relations, sets the stage for the
major political and economic struggles now taking place.
The
Structure of German Globalization
To
understand the current stage of development of capitalism in Germany
we need to explore the transnational base of Germany’s major
corporations. As noted in the Financial Times, ‘More than
in other European countries German companies have detached themselves
from their home base and projected themselves as European or international
concerns.’1
In
2001 Germany accounted for 11 of the world’s top 100 non-financial
transnational corporations (TNCs). The following chart shows their
world rank by foreign held assets and their transnationality index
(TNI) that combines the ratios for foreign held assets to national
assets, foreign sales to national sales and foreign employment to
national employment.
Corporation |
Rank
in Foreign
Held Assets |
|
Deutsche
Telekom |
5 |
82
|
Volkswagen |
15 |
51 |
E.On |
20 |
86 |
RWE |
22 |
81 |
BMW |
27
|
60 |
DaimlerChrysler |
35 |
97 |
BASF
|
40 |
54 |
Deutsche
Post |
41 |
96 |
Bayer |
42 |
58 |
Thyssenkrupp |
74
|
71 |
Bertelsmann |
80 |
43 |
The above corporations are among the largest in the world and their
managers and owners are a key contingent within the TCC in Germany.
Compared to TNCs headquartered in other countries Germany ranked
behind the US which hosts 28 of the top 100 TNCs, the UK, which
hosts 16, and France 12. But overall Germany is headquarters for
8,522 TNCS, the largest number in the world as well as host to 13,826
foreign affiliates doing business inside the German market. Such
large-scale presence of both parent TNCs and foreign affiliates
reflects their economic dominance and their growing social and political
base as well. In comparison the UK hosts 3,132 parent TNCs and 13,828
foreign affiliates while the United States is home to 3,235 TNCs
and host to 15, 712 foreign affiliates.3
In 2002 the overall transnationality index for Germany as a country
(foreign assets, employment and sales in ratio to their nationally
held percents plus the amount of foreign direct investment (FDI)
as a percent of gross fixed capital formation) had risen to 18%,
the same as the U.K. but greater than France at 11% and the US at
9%.4
Additionally foreigners hold about 40% of all stocks traded on the
Frankfurt DAX.
Cross-border
merger and acquisitions (M&A) activity is an important indicator
of globalization. These activities reveal the level of transnational
corporate integration, the growing interconnection of global production
chains and the expansion of the post-national economy. The following
chart compares the amount of cross-border M&A by sales and purchases
of the world’s largest economies from 1998 - 2002. Germany’s
position reflects its high level of transnationalization.
Country |
Sales
(millions of dollars) |
Purchases
(millions of dollars) (5) |
US |
1,043,945
|
591,468
|
UK |
525,160
|
872,614
|
Germany |
400,838
|
313,050
|
Netherlands |
130,690
|
171,726
|
France |
120,283
|
381,326
|
Japan |
56,866
|
49,651
|
Examining
the M&A activity of the top 20 TNCs between 1987-2001 we find
German corporations involved in the most deals with the second highest
value in dollars. While this is a limited number of TNCs we see
here the concentration of power that exists in the dominant sector
of capital. These 20 TNCs accounted for one-fifth of the total value
of cross-border M&A activity. The following chart includes 17
of the top 20 TNCs involved in cross border M&A over 14 years
of activity. More
>>
|